There are some issues with 360 videos and VP9. The older, less cpu-intensive codec, H.264, runs smoothly on practically all devices, so if you want a single codec to run as close to everywhere as possible-and can budget for the monetary costs-that should be your preference. ![]() At first, iOS devices didn’t support VP9, but that changed with the update to version 14. If you’re a developer, your friends’ phones may not be representative of the wider population. Older devices that don’t support hardware decoding are still in use. Some companies may closely guard their findings and exact video encoder settings, but information on the relative performance in different scenarios is available. Like any general purpose video coding format, there are a lot of interdependent settings that can make a big difference to the size of the output bitstream, quality, and overall costs, so you’ll need to find the right balance for your workflow and business model. It costs $0.20 per device to include HEVC support, which discourages adoption and may well give VP9 a longer tail for hardware manufacturers, even as new codecs eventually take over.Įarly comparisons suggested VP9 had a video compression disadvantage over its competitors, but Netflix claimed that this could be eliminated or reversed by fine-tuning the implementation. By contrast, HEVC is mired in patent issues, making it expensive-and potentially troublesome-to use. VP9 is open source, making it free and convenient to deploy. “KitKat” launched in 2013, so all but the most ancient devices can use it. Now even Apple has added support for the codec, making it the clear choice for high-resolution video in the macOS version of the Safari browser.Īndroid has supported VP9 since 4.4. Google and Youtube use VP9 for all of their 4K videos, which itself is a proof point that VP9 is a viable option for video streaming providers. Thanks to widespread hardware support, it gives you smoother playback on PCs in most scenarios, making it ideal for general use. VP9 can use hardware decoding on Intel and ARM devices. That makes it a great choice if you’re working with video at different sizes, or if you’re focusing specifically on HD. Like HEVC, VP9 has a 50% advantage over H.264, but VP9 can outperform HEVC at resolutions above HD. However, much like its predecessor, H.264, HEVC can be expensive, with patents and fees required to use it. Its successor, H.265 (or HEVC), is also common, though less popular, and uses up to 50% less bandwidth than H.264. Despite this, it is used by many services, as well as Blu-ray discs, and was the codec of choice for many early HDTV broadcasts. ![]() That means you need to pay royalties if you want to use it for hardware or paid content. This codec’s licensing system is complicated, though, with thousands of patents involved. ![]() ![]() Bitmovin Video Developer Report 2023: Which video codecs are you using in production? Most modern devices have hardware that can decode AVC, making it easy to play, making it a great choice if you want the broadest possible user base. According to Bitmovin’s Video Developer Report, H.264 (AVC) is the world’s most popular codec with over an estimated 85% of video-on-demand using it. Things move quickly in the world of video, and what’s popular today may not be so for long.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |